"Science and religion
are like two sides of a coin. One relies on heads, the other believes in
tales."
As a
child who was brought up in a traditional Hindu family and taught in a typical
convent school, I find myself in a rather dubious predicament here. After all
those years of chanting prayers, reciting hymns, seeking blessings and making
wishes, it almost feels like being bitten at 99, back to square 1 by the
longest reptile on board in the game of snakes and ladders.
Back
then, learning by repetition, we are taught not to ask
the questions that matter. Now that the good old days are over, it is time to
rock a few boats. Treading on what most would term ‘thin ice’, if I turn
out to be particularly clear, you have perhaps misunderstood what I said!
Born
and brought up in different ways of life- religion
that is to say- all of us possess concepts of faith that are derived out of
differing texts and when it comes to matters of the Almighty, we are seldom on
the same page. The question therefore- for most of us at least- is not whether
or not we believe but WHY do we do. The truth may set you free but first it
will piss you off.
Most
of us believe in God, the Creator- an
all powerful being who would have ‘caused the first cause’ and set things
rolling to eternity. But, while religion believes, science doubts. It is so
because if the ultimate purpose of this all powerful being was to create
intelligent (or arrogant?) beings who can raise such questions, then He
couldn’t have done a more inefficient job, for the human race wasn’t even
around for 99.9999% of the time elapsed since the moment of creation. Therefore
it is fairly reasonable to wonder whether or not He created the universe with a
purpose and if so, what?
People
working at the frontiers of physics, perplexed by this revelation, are trying
to confirm “God Particle” and are closing in on a model of our universe which
is ‘finite but with no boundaries’ i.e. completely self contained, having no
beginning or end. Then, as Prof. Stephen Hawking quite mischievously puts it,
‘what place for a Creator’?
Some
others believe in God, the Preserver- an
all knowing being who knew apples HAD to fall down and not go up, that Carbon
HAD to form long chains and crazy rings and who knew how to write and replicate
3 billion lettered codes, comprising of A, T, C and G- the DNA- with errors
less than 0.6%. Is it surprising that we can identify laws governing our
universe that never change
when we also know that the same universe prefers a state of uncertainty and
chaos over determinism and order? After all, there is no logical necessity for
it to obey rules.
But even
preservation doesn’t quite seem to rank on top of His list of priorities, for
natural forces directed by Him have left extinct 99.9% of all species that have
ever lived. It seems that when the answers provided by the likes of Newton and
Davy and Darwin seemed too complex or heretic to explain the mess we find
ourselves in, we chose to believe someone up there orchestrated all of this in
six days (by the spoken command “Let there be…”)
and rested on the seventh.
"God
created nature to amuse and confuse the man. Man created philosophy to help God
do so."
The
laws of science that have been developed over the last 300 years have been able
to explain the workings of our universe in all but the most extreme conditions.
That is, we have a generally accepted theory of exactly what transpired after the
Big Bang. But in the dearth of ideas as to what happened before it
and in the lack of strong evidences as to what caused it,
this event continues to be regarded as divine intervention or the work of
God.
Therefore,
we ought to assume that
an all knowing all powerful being chose a set
of laws- or in the language of elementary mathematics, some very specific
‘initial and boundary conditions’- that govern our world. But if that is true
why he now chooses to abstain himself from intervening in the large and small
scale workings of the universe, continues to be a mystery beyond the grasp of
my intellect. It’s almost like a referee who patiently chalks out the rules of
the game but leaves the arena right after the opening whistle and kick-off
(perhaps to enjoy it from a suitable vantage point), never to care enough about
the score, the fouls or the result, knowing all the while that somehow the
smartest of the players will eventually understand the rules and hopefully
learn to play by them!
“You
can have all the faith you want. But when it comes to this world don’t be an
idiot because you can tell me that you put your faith in God to get through the
day, but when it’s time to cross the road, I know you'll look both ways.”
It’s
a funny world that we live in today, one that reeks of uncertainty and insanity
and is sporadically marred by hatred and terror. So, if it makes some even a
teensy bit happy to realize that what they read in their Moral Science texts-
that everything happens for the good, that they’re here for a purpose etc- is
true, then so be it. That is their belief, a
notion of a ‘personal God’, someone they thank every morning and evening, for they believe
He ‘gives them their daily bread and forgives them for their sins’. For people
who couldn’t care enough, religion is shared belief.
And belief is nothing but (unquestionable?) faith in something/someone we
trust. Needless to say, it is nonsensical to waste time and energy
proving/refuting the existence of something we only believe doesn’t/does
exist.
"We
are all atheists about most of the Gods humanity has ever believed in. Some of
us just go one God further."
It is
however, the concept of ‘absolute morality’ of religion that is most deeply
disconcerting. Wars have been waged, heretics have been burned and blood has
been spilled over centuries whenever religious fanatics blinded by shared delusions of
some militant
faith have tried to force-feed people their notion
of personal God. Was there ever a more horrible blasphemy than to say that all knowledge
of good and God is confined in this book or that place
of worship?
Nothing exists
in this world apart from atoms and empty space, everything else
is opinion. So is good and bad. We create our own demons. What one
might consider bad or evil might just turn out to be a different way of life,
a radically different way of looking at the same thing. Religion and morality
are, and should be, mutually exclusive things- two uncorrelated random
variables. Remember- we create our own
demons.
I
don’t believe in God but I’m afraid of him. Perhaps, in our whim of ignorance
and arrogance, we have all been blinded or as Amish said ‘…we beheld gods
in what were great men of the past, for we believe that such great men couldn’t
possibly have existed in reality. We see magic in what was brilliant science,
for our limited intellect cannot understand that great knowledge. We retain
only rituals of what were deep philosophies, for it took courage and confidence
to ask questions. We divined myths in what was really history, for true
memories have all been forgotten’.
Perhaps
He has laid all the signs of His existence all around us in The Matrix or
within the enormous bounties of nature and is patiently waiting for our wits to
grow sharper- placing the question of His existence squarely before us all. Perhaps
we are not human beings who have a spiritual experience but spiritual beings
who have a human experience. Perhaps the
only difference between you and God is that you have forgotten you are divine.
"Doubt
is a pain too lonely to know that faith is his twin brother."
I
find it fitting to borrow the words of Robert Langdon- “Science tells me God
must exist. My mind tells me I’ll never understand God. And my heart tells me
I’m not meant to.”
No comments:
Post a Comment